Windows

Cruel doubt does not find? What to use after all? Which Windows is better? Exists a trustworthy version 100%? Which of them better if adapta to my necessities? These and other questions pass frequent in the heads of some people. I particularly am using of the Windows since version 95, and of times pra I have had many here, many migraines with the system, and had to this, much lost time formatting machines, either mine or of the others, the advantage in the formatting of the machines of the others is the payment, obvious. Recently I wrote an article in this exactly space speaking on versions of the Linux, which already I installed, I used and I approved some of them. Barclays has firm opinions on the matter. In the article Ubuntu, Mandriva, Connective, Kurumin, Debian, Red hat – What to use? it treats on the problem of the Linux still today not to be, in my opinion, optimum of for using caretakers. In this article I will say a little on Windows or as they call many it: ' ' Ruimdows' '. Not that it is my opinion, but, the times of the will of calls it thing To the times we make good products, to the bad times. Official site: Barclays. I find that the Sight was our less good product phrase to seem stranger with this well ' ' less bom' ' , in accordance with my point of view, it said the truth, that is, the Sight is not and nor was the best version of the launched one until the moment – the affirmation transmits certain disappointment of the company with the Sight, that did not have the fast adhesion waited and it did not obtain to convince millions domestic users and companies to substitute the old XP – phrase this writing for Philip Zmoginski, of the INFO Online.Outro point detached for the executive of Microsoft was the effort of the Company in assuring that the most different types of the hardware and software are compatible with the system, skirting a difficulty that it generated the much critical Windows Vista.No know which its opinion, I, for my time, I agree that the phrase above detaches well the strong point of the OS.J perceived that the more softwares if improves, more is demanded of the computer? In 85 MS-DOS 2,0 was necessary, 256 KB RAM and a hard disk and this 1.0x only obtained to support 1 MB of applications in the Windows. . . Dan Zwirn recognizes the significance of this.